I loved the NYT book review by Gertrude Himmelfarb. First the title is great: “Where Have All the Footnotes Gone?” Second of all, I just love the subject matter because I too hate endnotes and absolutely adore footnotes. I especially love those long 1/2-pagers that give you so much extra content and places to go to continue your studying if desired. The beauty is, you can look down from your page without having to annoyingly turn to the back of the book, and see what the author has to say further than he/she says in the piece. If it’s useful, you can read the whole thing and jot down some interesting notes for future reading.
So, the question becomes: is this possible and how does one do this easily on the Web? Piggin.net addresses this problem in its “macro-typography of footnotes” section. Although they suggest interleaving the notes inside the text, I see pop-ups as the best for us as historians (and the CSS seems relatively easy…famous last words?) with side notes as the second best. If it were easier to interleave the notes after paragraphs, that may work but apparently that is difficult. And anything labeled difficult by these folks, I tend to believe them! But both pop-ups and side notes can be “separate” from the document yet close enough as to not interrupt the reader’s flow too much. They will also allow for those wonderful and lengthy footnotes that can link to other sources that could then be pulled up in another browser or tab. That seems like money to me…
6 February 2007 at 3:34 pm
Hi Steven,
I agree with you. The NYT article was fun to read, and it is indeed a shame that footnotes have become endnotes in too many cases. I especially agree with the author’s comment that “In extenuation of Rousseau it should be said that his notes are discursive rather than bibliographical” and that this somewhat justifies placement at the end of his writings. In historical writing, however, footnotes are indeed essential, as Ms. Himmelfarb writes, to preventing the “physical discomfort of the reader” who has to bookmark two places and continually flip back and forth losing her place repeatedly. Additionally, in a historiographical essay, an author may mention a debate within the literature and can footnote the key authors and their main writings so that the reader has a more complete knowledge of the topic—especially useful if the flow of the reading is not interrupted.
After all of the reading on the footnoting-on-the-web problem, I still am not happy with any solution. As a designer and a historian, I suppose I have high standards…
Laura
6 February 2007 at 4:22 pm
[...] After reflecting on all the readings, and commenting on Steven’s lovely NOLA-themed blog (in &ldquoThe Lost Art of Footnoting”, this is why some variation of the pop-up/lightbox would be my choice. Maybe I would even add a [...]
28 July 2007 at 11:02 am
LOL. =)
i think footnotes are cute.